Legitimising Terror - The Liberal Way!

I think the West is self obsessed, be it America or the UK, even most of Europe,after the initial sympathy they offered to India, now they want to rationalize and legalize terror in the name of "Kashmir".

• The Liberal Arguments from the so called "Liberal", "Democratic","Rational", " First world" west is that, Kashmir is an elephant in the room for India, and if through the instrument of terror, which actually kills and maims Indians in the central India, another state can actually legitimately legalize the action of its so called "Non State Actors" in the name of terror.
• So, if 10 Pakistanis, mind you its 10 Pakistanis and not 10 Kashmiris, trained in sophisticated commando operations, attack India, and kill 178 people, the world actually endorses the pain of these "Pakistanis" for the "Kashmiris" and thinks India should talk and cede Kashmir with the gun on its head. Is this the ideology that the west has based itself on? Is this what Abe Lincoln fought the civil war on and united Americans? Is this the premise on which the British solved the Northern Ireland Issue? Is this the way, secular, democratic governments cow down and surrender their union to the wishes of "non state actors" who take the worlds largest democracy to hostage?
• The world needs to respect India for just one thing, first and foremost, it is THE WORLDS LARGEST DEMOCRACY, like it or not, and if anyone thinks, ANY ONE , they can cow India down to cede Kashmir by using the GUN, i would just say, "Bring em on!".
• Another hundred MUMBAI INCIDENTS can NOT wrest Kashmir from India, another 100 million deaths can not, any one who wants to test it is welcome.
• India agrees that Kashmir is a dispute, we were talking in every way possible to Pakistanis and Kashmiris and the west needs to understand the complications of the Issue. First of all, there is no concept of "Freedom" for Kashmir, as there is no legal base for this argument, Kashmir can either go to India or go to Pakistan, there is no third option in the UN Resolutions of 1948. Anyone questioning this can actually go to the united nations website and have a look at the PDF document online. So, those who are peddling the idea of "Azadi" for Kashmir are either stupid or naive.
• At least, the document on UN website proves that Freedom is not an option, so how can Kashmir get freedom, it can happen only when India gives up on it and allows Kashmir Freedom, like some recent west European nations did, but then, would Pakistan give up its part and allow a full independent country called Kashmir? It is not a part of state policy of Pakistan, as it has always insisted that Kashmir belongs to Pakistan and never actually supported freedom. The other option is the Bosnia way, which would be an all out war against India by International Forces to liberate Kashmir and Balkanise INDIA, well, I don't know if any realist would bet on that happening.
• So, narrow political appeasement of nations and short sighted solutions of breaking up countries will lead only to more blood shed, the only solution is to make it clear to nations that "Terror" can not be implemented as a state policy and its cost would be punitive.
  I am not surprised, for, in some societies, the length of the mini skirt decides the amount of democracy and free thinking, rather than "Neutrality" of thought and action.
• Liberals are also extremists, just because, they also subscribe to a far end view of the spectrum not supported by the majority. My message to the West, PLEASE DO NOT PREACH WHAT YOU WOULD NOT FOLLOW!